Find files, editable templates and browser test targets by what you need to make or test. The directory below is cut by format; the two collections under it cut the same library by subject and by workflow.
Page 24 of 98; 24 results per page.
Clean line-art extraction (black lines on white) for line-art-conditioned generation and line-extraction quality tests.
Tangent-space surface-normal map encoded from the scene depth: a normal-conditioning input for guided generation and relighting tests.
OpenPose-style keypoint skeleton for the figure: a pose-control input for guided generation and a target for pose-estimation checks.
Sparse scribble derived from the edges: the loose hand-drawn control input for scribble-guided image generation.
Semantic segmentation map (subject vs background): the label reference for segmentation-conditioned generation and mask-quality scoring.
Operating chart PNG for Copper Oven Bakery. A 1440 by 900 RGB chart with 8 labeled source-derived observations in CAD.
A canny edge map for the published plate d-clipboard.png, 832x1216. Canny edge detection at low threshold 0.1 and high 0.3, run at the plate's own resolution so the edges land on the same pixels as the photograph they came from. Lit coverage measures 4.0% of the frame. The plate and this map are the same scene at the same size, so they can be compared pixel for pixel rather than by eye.
A depth map for the published plate d-clipboard.png, 1024x1497. Monocular depth from Depth Anything V2 (vitl), rendered at the plate's long edge rather than the 512-pixel default, so depth and colour can be compared per pixel without a resample in between. Lit coverage measures 99.7% of the frame. The plate and this map are the same scene at the same size, so they can be compared pixel for pixel rather than by eye.
The same view of a delivery note on a clipboard held against a van door, outdoor overcast light, slight angle, expanded to 512x704 - 192 pixels added above alone, so every row index shifts - so 27.3% of this frame is invented canvas. The original sits at pixels 0,192 to 512,704. Compare it INSET by 40 pixels: over that core it differs from the original by only 5.301/255, the VAE round trip, but over the whole rectangle by 6.294/255, because the pad deliberately feathers the original's outer edge into the new area. A test that expects the whole rectangle untouched fails on a correct tool.
A 512x512 view of a delivery note on a clipboard held against a van door, outdoor overcast light, slight angle - the frame an outpainting tool is given, cropped from the published plate nss-d-clipboard_00001_.png. Its companion expands it to 512x704 with 192 pixels added above alone, so every row index shifts, and the boundary record in this group states the exact rectangle this image occupies inside that frame - so where it ended up can be checked rather than eyeballed.
A tangent-space surface normal map for the published plate d-clipboard.png, 832x1216 - the same size as the plate, so the two compare pixel for pixel with no resample in between. RGB encodes the XYZ surface direction remapped from -1..1 into 0..255. Decoded back to vectors this file measures a mean length of 0.997, which is the number to check your own decode against: a reader that transposes the channels or inverts the remap still produces a plausible-looking image, and lights the surface the wrong way.
A canny edge map for the published plate d-invoice.png, 1216x832. Canny edge detection at low threshold 0.1 and high 0.3, run at the plate's own resolution so the edges land on the same pixels as the photograph they came from. Lit coverage measures 6.9% of the frame. The plate and this map are the same scene at the same size, so they can be compared pixel for pixel rather than by eye.
A depth map for the published plate d-invoice.png, 1497x1024. Monocular depth from Depth Anything V2 (vitl), rendered at the plate's long edge rather than the 512-pixel default, so depth and colour can be compared per pixel without a resample in between. Lit coverage measures 98.2% of the frame. The plate and this map are the same scene at the same size, so they can be compared pixel for pixel rather than by eye.
The same view of a printed invoice on a wooden desk beside a calculator and a pen, flat lay, soft daylight, expanded to 512x704 - 192 pixels added below alone, the one case where the origin does NOT move - so 27.3% of this frame is invented canvas. The original sits at pixels 0,0 to 512,512. Compare it INSET by 40 pixels: over that core it differs from the original by only 4.626/255, the VAE round trip, but over the whole rectangle by 5.717/255, because the pad deliberately feathers the original's outer edge into the new area. A test that expects the whole rectangle untouched fails on a correct tool.
A 512x512 view of a printed invoice on a wooden desk beside a calculator and a pen, flat lay, soft daylight - the frame an outpainting tool is given, cropped from the published plate nss-d-invoice_00001_.png. Its companion expands it to 512x704 with 192 pixels added below alone, the one case where the origin does NOT move, and the boundary record in this group states the exact rectangle this image occupies inside that frame - so where it ended up can be checked rather than eyeballed.
A tangent-space surface normal map for the published plate d-invoice.png, 1216x832 - the same size as the plate, so the two compare pixel for pixel with no resample in between. RGB encodes the XYZ surface direction remapped from -1..1 into 0..255. Decoded back to vectors this file measures a mean length of 0.9949, which is the number to check your own decode against: a reader that transposes the channels or inverts the remap still produces a plausible-looking image, and lights the surface the wrong way.
A canny edge map for the published plate d-ledger.png, 1216x832. Canny edge detection at low threshold 0.1 and high 0.3, run at the plate's own resolution so the edges land on the same pixels as the photograph they came from. Lit coverage measures 2.5% of the frame. The plate and this map are the same scene at the same size, so they can be compared pixel for pixel rather than by eye.
A clean 512x512 crop of an open paper accounts ledger with ruled columns, fountain pen resting on the page, window light, taken from the published plate d-ledger.png before anything was added to it. This is the ANSWER KEY for its group: the object in the source file was composited onto this image, so this is exactly what was behind it. Nothing else in the group came from a second tool's guess.
A depth map for the published plate d-ledger.png, 1497x1024. Monocular depth from Depth Anything V2 (vitl), rendered at the plate's long edge rather than the 512-pixel default, so depth and colour can be compared per pixel without a resample in between. Lit coverage measures 98.2% of the frame. The plate and this map are the same scene at the same size, so they can be compared pixel for pixel rather than by eye.
The same view of an open paper accounts ledger with ruled columns, fountain pen resting on the page, window light, with a foreign object composited over 5.60% of the frame as a single organic region, neither a rectangle nor an ellipse. This is the file an object-removal tool is given. Outside the mask it is byte-identical to the clean plate beside it, so any difference a tool leaves there is damage it did rather than content it was handed.
An open paper accounts ledger with ruled columns, fountain pen resting on the page, window light, with the object taken back out by Stable Diffusion 1.5 inpainting and the gap reconstructed from the surrounding context alone - the masked latents are erased before sampling, so the model never saw what it was painting over. Inside the mask it differs from the source by 106.971/255 and from the ground-truth plate by 21.952/255; the second number is NOT expected to be small, because an inpainter invents plausible content rather than recovering what was there. Beyond a 16-pixel ring around the mask the frame changes by only 3.353/255, which is the full-frame VAE round trip and not an edit.
The exact footprint of the object sitting over an open paper accounts ledger with ruled columns, fountain pen resting on the page, window light, as an 8-bit mask covering 5.60% of the frame as a single organic region, neither a rectangle nor an ellipse. It holds only the values 0 and 255. The footprint is what DREW the object, so it is ground truth by construction rather than a segmentation of it. Hard-edged on purpose: a feathered edge has no exact footprint, and the exactness is the point of shipping it.
A tangent-space surface normal map for the published plate d-ledger.png, 1216x832 - the same size as the plate, so the two compare pixel for pixel with no resample in between. RGB encodes the XYZ surface direction remapped from -1..1 into 0..255. Decoded back to vectors this file measures a mean length of 0.995, which is the number to check your own decode against: a reader that transposes the channels or inverts the remap still produces a plausible-looking image, and lights the surface the wrong way.
A canny edge map for the published plate d-menu.png, 1216x832. Canny edge detection at low threshold 0.1 and high 0.3, run at the plate's own resolution so the edges land on the same pixels as the photograph they came from. Lit coverage measures 3.5% of the frame. The plate and this map are the same scene at the same size, so they can be compared pixel for pixel rather than by eye.
